Problem with radiometric dating dating dokkum
The scientific method can only disprove theories or increase the power of previous predictions that have yet to be disproved, but it can never absolutely prove anything to be absolutely true.
Therefore, the best thing to do in science is to continually question and test previous hypothesis and theories to see if they continue to hold up under scrutiny.
How can the very top, volcanic rock be older than the very bottom layer basalt rock?
Even evolutionists admit that those Indian artifacts are not 1.3 billion years old!
Since the early 20th century, Radioisotope dating has been used to bolster the vast time spans ascribed to the geologic record.
However, research by geologist John Woodmorappe (a pen name) revealed that the radiometric methods used today were actually hand-picked to coincide with the dates previously assumed for the geologic column diagrams.
Why would creatures that would seem to share the same general environment while alive be so widely separated in the fossil record if they did indeed live at the same time and in pretty much the same location?
This pattern arises when species that appear on few islands occur only on the islands with the most species, while only the most widespread species are found on the islands with few species (Wright et al., 1998).
This method is used only on metamorphic and igneous rocks – not sedimentary rocks (which are rocks laid down by water – and is where the fossils are primarily found).The radio-dating calculations are based on a series of Assumptions: 1) The decay rate has not changed.Young-earth creation geologists have long held that most sedimentary strata resulted from waterborne deposits during Noah’s Flood.Also remember that modern disasters (on a smaller scale) like Mount St.Helens and Southwest Pacific tsunamis produced large deposits of multi-layered strata in a matter of hours or days…
Yes, we all have been inundated with teaching that rocks are dated in the millions and billions of years, but are they really?