Carbon 14 dating is false asian dating frankfurt

Posted by / 13-Aug-2017 17:48

Carbon 14 dating is false

It is easy to correlate the inner rings of a younger living tree with the outer rings of an older dead tree.

The correlation is possible because, in the Southwest region of the United States, the widths of tree rings vary from year to year with the rainfall, and trees all over the Southwest have the same pattern of variations.

Carbon from these sources is very low in C-14 because these sources are so old and have not been mixed with fresh carbon from the air.

This means that the tree-ring dates would be slightly too young, not too old.

If we extrapolate as far back as ten thousand years ago, we find the atmosphere would not have had any C-14 in it at all.

If they are right, this means all C-14 ages greater than two or three thousand years need to be lowered drastically and that the earth can be no older than ten thousand years. Answer: Yes, Cook is right that C-14 is forming today faster than it's decaying.

ICR creationists claim that this discredits C-14 dating. Answer: It does discredit the C-14 dating of freshwater mussels, but that's about all.

Kieth and Anderson show considerable evidence that the mussels acquired much of their carbon from the limestone of the waters they lived in and from some very old humus as well.

carbon 14 dating is false-83carbon 14 dating is false-42carbon 14 dating is false-13

Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow.

One thought on “carbon 14 dating is false”